1.
How did the QR issue originate?
Under
the GATT, imports have to be controlled only through tariffs or customs
duties and not through quantitative restrictions such as quotas, licences
etc. All member countries have to abide by its provisions. There are,
however, some exceptions to this rule. One such exception is that a
country can take recourse to QRs on grounds of balance of payments (BOP)
difficulties. It is under this exception that India has been maintaining
QRs.
Till
1993, our BOP situation had been quite uneasy. Since 1994-95 there has
been steady improvement in our foreign exchange (FE) reserves position:
(US$
billion)
|
Year
ending on
|
Total
FE reserves at the end of financial year
|
Total
importsduring the year
|
|
31st
March 1993
|
9.8
|
21.88
|
|
31st
March 1994
|
19.3
|
23.31
|
|
31st
March 1995
|
25.2
|
28.65
|
|
31st
March 1996
|
21.7
|
36.68
|
|
31st
March 1997
|
26.4
|
39.13
|
|
31st
March 1998
|
29.4
|
41.48
|
|
31st
March 1999
|
32.5
|
42.39
|
|
31st
March 2000
(Provisional)
|
38.0
|
42.20
|
As
may be seen, our foreign exchange reserves became quite healthy over
the years when compared to our total imports. With the improvement in
the balance of payments position, certain members of the WTO disputed-around
1995-our need or justification to continue Quantitative Restrictions
for BOP reasons. India had no go but to agree to phase out QRs.
By
1997, India could negotiate with most of the trading partners, with
the exception of USA, to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution for
phasing out these QRs. Under the Agreements, the QRs were to be withdrawn
over a six-year period ending 31st March 2003. USA, however, felt that
the period was too long and filed a dispute against India in the WTO.
The Dispute Settlement Panel of WTO which was constituted in November
1997 to adjudicate ruled against India. India filed an appeal before
the Appellate Body of WTO against the findings of the Panel but the
Appellate Body also upheld the findings of the Panel challenged by India.
Consequently, we are now obliged to withdraw QRs. An agreement was signed
between India and USA for determining the reasonable period of time,
under which QRs on the remaining 1429 tariff lines were to be removed
by 1st April, 2001, of which QRs on 714 were to be removed before 1st
April, 2000.
Incidentally,
out of the 136 members of the WTO, QRs are being maintained by only
five countries other than India i.e. Tunisia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh
and Sri Lanka – and they are also in the process of phasing out the
QRs. No other country maintains QRs except textile quotas which also
have to be phased out by 1st January, 2005 under the Agreement on Textiles
and Clothing.