4. What about
protection to agriculture? And the Indian farmers?
India is
very competitive in agriculture. In fact, the noted economist Dr. Ashok
Gulati after an extensive study of the issue has concluded that India
should negotiate for a ceiling on tariff bindings on any agricultural
commodity/product at no higher than 50% for any country.
Dr. Manmohan
Singh in his budget speech for 1993-94 said: "Our strategy of gradually
reducing the level of protection to Indian industry and integrating
our economy with the world economy will clearly help Indian agriculture".
Nevertheless, import duty on most agricultural items of interest to
us has been generally pegged at 35%, which is the highest slab of customs
duty in the current Budget (2000-2001).
After conducting
successful negotiations with its trading partners, India has been able
to raise the bound rates* of tariff on paddy and broken rice from zero
to 80%; for milled or semi-milled rice from zero to 70%; skimmed milk
powder from zero to 60%; millet from zero to 70%; maize seed from zero
to 70% while other maize from zero to 60%; grain sorghum from zero to
80% and so on. The applied rates of duties have also been raised to
the bound levels for most of the above items.
India has
generally bound its tariffs on primary agricultural commodities at 100%;
on processed items at 150% and on edible oils at 300%. India can raise
its applied rates in case of any surge in imports. But import duties
have to be calibrated keeping in mind domestic availability and also
consumers’ interests.
As a matter
of fact, duties have been revised upwards to safeguard the interests
of the domestic industry time and again. For example, based on the representations
from the domestic industry, the customs duty on sugar which was at zero
duty till 27th April, 1998 has been raised upwards as follows:
|
From
28.4.98 to 13.1.99
|
5%
+ Rs.850 per MT of CVD*
|
|
From
14.1.99 to 27.2.99
|
20%
+ Rs.850 per MT of CVD
|
|
From
28.2.99 to 29.12.99
|
25%
+ 10% surcharge + Rs.850 per MT of CVD
|
|
From
30.12.99 to 7.2.2000
|
40%
+ Rs.850 per MT of CVD
|
|
From
8.2.2000 till date
|
60%
+ Rs.850 per MT of CVD
|
* Countervailing
duty
The basic
customs duty on refined edible oils has been increased from 15% to 25%
w.e.f. 30.12.99. A further 10% increase in basic customs duty has been
effected from 12.6.2000.
Earlier,
the duty was kept at a low level as there was some shortage of edible
oil in the country and the Government wanted to protect the consumers
from any surge in the domestic prices of edible oils. Thus, a happy
balance between the interests of the consumers and of the domestic producers,
is being maintained by Government by timely calibration of applied tariffs
within the bound tariffs.
The basic
customs duty on chicken legs and other products of chicken meat has
been raised from 35% to 100% w.e.f. 12.5.2000.
*
Bound rates are rates of customs duty "bound" or fixed at
a certain level, beyond which the duty cannot be raised. Thus, these
are ceilings on tariff rates.
|
To
take care of domestic concerns the same WTO has given us
the following weapons to meet with abnormal situations:
|
|
Provision
in the
WTO Agreement
|
Gist
of the provision
|
|
1.Tariff
protection
|
Applied
tariff can be raised at any time provided they do not exceed
bound rates
|
|
2.Article
VI of GATT andAgreement on implementation of Article VI (Anti-dumping
Agreement)
|
Anti-dumping
duties can be imposed if a product is dumped in the importing
country at less than its normal value provided it causes material
injury to domestic industry.
|
|
3.Article
VI of GATT and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
(ASCM)
|
Countervailing
duties can be imposed if a product is subsidised by the exporting
country provided it causes material injury to domestic industry.
|
|
4.Article
XIX of GATT and Agreement on Safeguards
|
Safeguard
action (Imposition of duties or temporary QRs) can be taken
when there is a surge in imports causing or threatening to cause
serious injury to domestic industry. Bill to amend FTDR* Act
to allow for QRs is being introduced.
|
|
5.Article
XX of GATT
|
As
a general exception, measures can be taken to protect human,
animal or plant life or health; to protect public morals; conservation
of exhaustible natural resources etc.
|
|
6.Article
XXI of GATT
|
Measures
can be taken under security exceptions.
|
|
7.Article
XVIII: B of GATT
|
QRs
can be imposed whenever BoP position deteriorates.
|
*
Foreign Trade (Development & Rgulation act
Back Home